[pooma-dev] Re: Compilers

Richard Guenther rguenth at tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de
Thu Aug 19 20:16:20 UTC 2004


Jeffrey D. Oldham wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
> 
>> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Jeffrey D. Oldham wrote:
>>
>>  
>>
>>> Richard Guenther wrote:
>>>
>>>   
>>>
>>>> -POOMA version 2.4.0 has been ported to the following platforms and
>>>> +POOMA version 2.4.1 has been tested on the following platforms and
>>>> compilers; please find the instructions for your platform within this
>>>> document and follow the steps.
>>>>
>>>> -    o SGI IRIX 6.X, with the Kuck and Associates KCC compiler
>>>> -      (v3.3d or later, including 3.4x)
>>>> -    o SGI IRIX 6.X, with the GCC compiler
>>>> -      (v2.95 or greater)
>>>> -    o SGI IRIX 6.X, with SGI C++ 7.3 or later compiler
>>>> -      (without patch 3659!)
>>>> -    o Linux, with the Kuck and Associates KCC compiler
>>>> -      (v3.3d or later, including 3.4x)
>>>>     o Linux, with the GCC compiler
>>>> -      (v2.95 or greater)
>>>> +      (v3.3 or greater)
>>>>     o Linux, with the Intel icpc compiler
>>>> -      (v6.0 or greater)
>>>> +      (v7.2 or greater)
>>>>     
>>
>>
>> Ok, I just checked which additional compilers/architectures I can test on
>> and unfortunately the SGI and HP machines I had access to were shut down
>> recently (they were old anyways).  So the ones above are the only ones
>> I can test on.  Does anyone here have access to machines with the
>> SGI or the HP compilers?  Does it even matter?  What about NAG and PGI?
>> It would be interesting for those who support it to check OpenMP support.
>>
>> Before a release I will test with gcc-3.3 and gcc-3.4 on ia32 and with
>> Intel on ia64 including OpenMP.  I'll also do one round of testing with
>> MPI and Cheetah using gcc-3.4 on ia32.
>>  
>>
> I do not think SGI or HP matter right now.  We should definitely check 
> OpenMP.  I can check gcc 3.3.4 and 3.4 on ia32 with Cheetah and MM.

Ok.

> Have all outstanding patches been checked in?

I don't know yet - I think I submitted all patches I can remember but 
still want to go through a diff of two of my local repositories to 
current CVS.  That may take another week or so.

Richard.

>  Are we ready to start 
> testing Pooma and Cheetah?  (Cheetah has a set of tests to check.  See 
> the Cheetah CVS repository.)
> 




More information about the pooma-dev mailing list