Compilers

[Jeffrey D. Oldham]

Richard Guenther wrote:

>On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Jeffrey D. Oldham wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>-POOMA version 2.4.0 has been ported to the following platforms and
>>>+POOMA version 2.4.1 has been tested on the following platforms and
>>>compilers; please find the instructions for your platform within this
>>>document and follow the steps.
>>>
>>>-	o SGI IRIX 6.X, with the Kuck and Associates KCC compiler
>>>-	  (v3.3d or later, including 3.4x)
>>>-	o SGI IRIX 6.X, with the GCC compiler
>>>-	  (v2.95 or greater)
>>>-	o SGI IRIX 6.X, with SGI C++ 7.3 or later compiler
>>>-	  (without patch 3659!)
>>>-	o Linux, with the Kuck and Associates KCC compiler
>>>-	  (v3.3d or later, including 3.4x)
>>>	o Linux, with the GCC compiler
>>>-	  (v2.95 or greater)
>>>+	  (v3.3 or greater)
>>>	o Linux, with the Intel icpc compiler
>>>-	  (v6.0 or greater)
>>>+	  (v7.2 or greater)
>>>      
>>>
>
>Ok, I just checked which additional compilers/architectures I can test on
>and unfortunately the SGI and HP machines I had access to were shut down
>recently (they were old anyways).  So the ones above are the only ones
>I can test on.  Does anyone here have access to machines with the
>SGI or the HP compilers?  Does it even matter?  What about NAG and PGI?
>It would be interesting for those who support it to check OpenMP support.
>
>Before a release I will test with gcc-3.3 and gcc-3.4 on ia32 and with
>Intel on ia64 including OpenMP.  I'll also do one round of testing with
>MPI and Cheetah using gcc-3.4 on ia32.
>  
>
I do not think SGI or HP matter right now.  We should definitely check 
OpenMP.  I can check gcc 3.3.4 and 3.4 on ia32 with Cheetah and MM.

Have all outstanding patches been checked in?  Are we ready to start 
testing Pooma and Cheetah?  (Cheetah has a set of tests to check.  See 
the Cheetah CVS repository.)

-- 
Jeffrey D. Oldham
oldham at codesourcery.com