[pooma-dev] Re: Compilers

[Jeffrey D. Oldham]

Richard Guenther wrote:

> Jeffrey D. Oldham wrote:
>
>> Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 18 Aug 2004, Jeffrey D. Oldham wrote:
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>> Richard Guenther wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>> -POOMA version 2.4.0 has been ported to the following platforms and
>>>>> +POOMA version 2.4.1 has been tested on the following platforms and
>>>>> compilers; please find the instructions for your platform within this
>>>>> document and follow the steps.
>>>>>
>>>>> -    o SGI IRIX 6.X, with the Kuck and Associates KCC compiler
>>>>> -      (v3.3d or later, including 3.4x)
>>>>> -    o SGI IRIX 6.X, with the GCC compiler
>>>>> -      (v2.95 or greater)
>>>>> -    o SGI IRIX 6.X, with SGI C++ 7.3 or later compiler
>>>>> -      (without patch 3659!)
>>>>> -    o Linux, with the Kuck and Associates KCC compiler
>>>>> -      (v3.3d or later, including 3.4x)
>>>>>     o Linux, with the GCC compiler
>>>>> -      (v2.95 or greater)
>>>>> +      (v3.3 or greater)
>>>>>     o Linux, with the Intel icpc compiler
>>>>> -      (v6.0 or greater)
>>>>> +      (v7.2 or greater)
>>>>>     
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ok, I just checked which additional compilers/architectures I can 
>>> test on
>>> and unfortunately the SGI and HP machines I had access to were shut 
>>> down
>>> recently (they were old anyways).  So the ones above are the only ones
>>> I can test on.  Does anyone here have access to machines with the
>>> SGI or the HP compilers?  Does it even matter?  What about NAG and PGI?
>>> It would be interesting for those who support it to check OpenMP 
>>> support.
>>>
>>> Before a release I will test with gcc-3.3 and gcc-3.4 on ia32 and with
>>> Intel on ia64 including OpenMP.  I'll also do one round of testing with
>>> MPI and Cheetah using gcc-3.4 on ia32.
>>>  
>>>
>> I do not think SGI or HP matter right now.  We should definitely 
>> check OpenMP.  I can check gcc 3.3.4 and 3.4 on ia32 with Cheetah and 
>> MM.
>
>
> Ok.
>
>> Have all outstanding patches been checked in?
>
>
> I don't know yet - I think I submitted all patches I can remember but 
> still want to go through a diff of two of my local repositories to 
> current CVS.  That may take another week or so.

OK.  I await your confirmation before beginning testing.

> Richard.
>
>>  Are we ready to start testing Pooma and Cheetah?  (Cheetah has a set 
>> of tests to check.  See the Cheetah CVS repository.)
>>
>


-- 
Jeffrey D. Oldham
oldham at codesourcery.com