[vsipl++] [patch] Increase max size of split-complex fast convolution

[Don McCoy]

Jules Bergmann wrote:
> This looks good, please check it in.
>
> Did we resolve the use of asserts on the SPE?  Do they abort the 
> program, or still cause it to deadlock?
>
>
They still cause a deadlock.  This patch add an alternative, called 
spe_assert(), though I note that it still hangs in abort(), but at least 
the messages get out to the console.

Note: we may want to consider using -NDEBUG for release builds of SPE 
code, as this new version pulls in the stdio header otherwise.  Is the 
same true with the system assert?

Still ok to check in?

-- 
Don McCoy
don (at) CodeSourcery
(888) 776-0262 / (650) 331-3385, x712

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: fc4k2.changes
URL: <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/vsipl++/attachments/20070323/34de02e8/attachment.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: fc4k2.diff
URL: <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/vsipl++/attachments/20070323/34de02e8/attachment-0001.ksh>