[vsipl++] CFAR Benchmark cleanup

[Jules Bergmann]

Don McCoy wrote:
> Jules Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> 'strip' should be allocated outside of cfar_detect, similar to cpow.
>>
>> Unfortunately, passing an additional parameter breaks the interface 
>> consistency with ImplSlice and ImplVector.
>>
> 
> I think it would be a cleaner solution if I just passed 'loop' and 
> '&time' in as additional parameters and then the temp v4sf vector could 
> be created before the timer was started.  I believe firbank does it that 
> way, so it would make those two cases match a little better.  It also 
> has the effect of eliminating the function call overhead.
> 
> Would that be ok?

That sounds great!  It is much simpler than what I was proposing.

				-- Jules
-- 
Jules Bergmann
CodeSourcery
jules at codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x705