[arm-gnu] Release notes comment and question (bit-fields)
Robby Maududy
obhie.bgx at gmail.com
Sat Oct 20 00:17:25 UTC 2012
ok sir,,thank you..
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Gene Smith <gds at chartertn.net> wrote:
> Looking at the release notes for Sourcery CodeBench Lite EABI 2012.03-56,
> I don't see the release notes for the previous version, 2011-09-69. Instead
> it jumps to 2011.03-42. Guess this is just a typo.
>
> The question is regarding a specific release note for the newest version
> 2012.03-56:
>
> <quote>
> Fix for bit-field optimization bug. A compiler bug that caused incorrect
> code to be generated for programs using bit-fields has been fixed.
> <end quote>
>
> On this mailing list a bug like this was discussed a while back (Aug/Sept
> 2010)
> Subject: Access to volatile bit-fields.
> It referenced this bugzilla report:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/**show_bug.cgi?id=23623<http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23623>
> I think this was a fairly special case and did not mean that *any* usage
> of a bit-field was broken in older versions. ??
>
> Thanks,
> Gene Smith
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> arm-gnu mailing list
> arm-gnu at codesourcery.com
> http://sourcerytools.com/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-gnu<http://sourcerytools.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/arm-gnu>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/arm-gnu/attachments/20121020/1d7f256e/attachment.html>
More information about the arm-gnu
mailing list