[vsipl++] [patch] Document QR Decomposition

[Jules Bergmann]

> not <type>qrd</type> ?

Yes, that sounds more appropriate.  Does docbook have <class> even?

>> It would help if the tables had captions.
> 
> I believe the missing captions are the result of the bug I identified 
> recently in our stylesheets, where formal.object.heading is made a noop 
> because of issues in some other contexts.

Ok, let's punt on this for now.


>> Final senctence: "Note that the return matrix may have a different 
>> block type from Block"
> 
> We never explain what 'Blocks' are, and in fact, avoid even mentioning 
> blocks throughout the rest of the manual for that reason. I typically 
> just mark the return type with 'unspecified' for such cases, for this 
> reason.

Ok.  Let's do that here too.  IIRC, the decl shows the block return type 
as "unspecified".

				thanks,
				-- Jules
-- 
Jules Bergmann
CodeSourcery
jules at codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x705