[vsipl++] [patch] Binary and ternary elementwise functions

[Jules Bergmann]

Mike LeBlanc wrote:
> It looks good, except ...
> 
> Should all those <literal> phrases become, say, <code>?

Hard to say, strictly speaking they're not intended to be valid code.

For example, in describing the 'pow' function:

	<literal>Z(i) = pow(A(i) ** B(i))</literal>

C++ doesn't have a power operator '**'.

If docbook had a math mode ... but I digress.  Perhaps 
<treatthisasliteralbutitreallyshouldbemath>  :)

Stefan, should these be <code>?

				-- Jules


-- 
Jules Bergmann
CodeSourcery
jules at codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x705