[vsipl++] [patch] Fix dot product benchmark for split complex case

[Don McCoy]

Jules Bergmann wrote:
> Instead of ifdef'ing the case out, can you make the test class t_dot2 
> check the evaluator's ct_valid flag (the check would be through an 
> implicit template parameter / class specialization).  That would be a 
> little more robust, in case this code ever gets copied-and-pasted.
Here is a revised patch.

-- 
Don McCoy
don (at) CodeSourcery
(888) 776-0262 / (650) 331-3385, x712

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: bdot2.changes
URL: <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/vsipl++/attachments/20070611/516f9b2d/attachment.ksh>
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: bdot2.diff
URL: <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/vsipl++/attachments/20070611/516f9b2d/attachment-0001.ksh>