[gnu-internal] Re: [vsipl++] [patch] Quickstart updates for ref-impl
Mark Mitchell
mark at codesourcery.com
Tue Jan 30 17:35:38 UTC 2007
Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>> + <section>
>> + <title>C-VSIPL</title>
>> + <para>
>> + A C-VSIPL implementation can be used by Sourcery VSIPL++ to
>> + to implement many functions, including linear algebra, solvers,
>> + and signal processing objects (such as FFT).
>> + </para>
Is "C-VSIPL" the accepted term? I think the initial term is just
"VSIPL". Maybe we should say "VSIPL Back End" in the <title>, which
will make clear that this is about a back end, but leave out the "C-",
here and elsewhere?
>> + <para>
>> + When configuring Sourcery VSIPL++ to be used as the reference
>> + implementation under the BSD license, the following configuration
>> + flags should be used:
"If you wish to use the BSD-licensed reference-implementation subset of
Sourcery VSIPL++, you must configure with the following options:"
>> + <listitem>
>> + <para><option>--enable-ref-impl</option></para>
>> + <para>
>> + Configures Sourcery VSIPL++ to be used as the reference
>> + implementation. This is necessary, otherwise Sourcery VSIPL++
>> + requires non-BSD files to operate.
Saying "Configures" again here is redundant; these are configuration
options. So, maybe:
"Build only the reference-implementation subset of Sourcery VSIPL++. If
you do not use this option, the complete, optimized implementation of
Sourcery VSIPL++ will be built."
>> + Configures Sourcery VSIPL++ to use a C-VSIP library for linear
>> + algebra and signal processing. This is necessary, otherwise
>> + linear algebra and signal processing functionality will not be
>> + available.
"Use a VSIPL library as the back end for VSIPL++. You must provide this
option when configuring with <option>--enable-ref-impl</option> because
the reference-implementation subset of Sourcery VISPL++ does not support
alternative back ends."
> (Technically, nothing would prevent us from letting --enable-ref-impl
> imply the two options --enable-cvsip and --enable-fft=cvsip.)
That would probably be even better, if we could do it, but I don't want
to introduce feature-creep.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark at codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713
More information about the vsipl++
mailing list