[vsipl++] [patch] Support for Cell FFT's up to 4K points.

[Don McCoy]

Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> Are you referring to dispatching a real FFT to complex FFT ? I don't think
> this is a good idea. Doing a real FFT should be substantially faster than
> a complex FFT, and take much less memory.
>   
I was suggesting a short-term fix just to provide this support, but I'm 
not sure why... as you say, it won't be faster (although I guess it 
could take advantage of being able to perform multiple simultaneous FFTs).

Since we don't need these right away and can always put them back later, 
should I rip the r->c and c->r support out for now, just to avoid 
confusion? 


-- 
Don McCoy
don (at) CodeSourcery
(888) 776-0262 / (650) 331-3385, x712