[vsipl++] [patch] Minor CFAR changes

[Mark Mitchell]

Don McCoy wrote:
> Jules Bergmann wrote:
>> Attached graphs show original (cfar-orig) and new (cfar) performance,
>> for GCC 3.4 and GCC 4.1 on Pastec.  The changes for the slice version
>> have a larger impact.  Using 4.1 is a win!

What's Pastec?

It's nice to know GCC 4.1 is good for something!  But, from what you
said this morning, don't those results still fall short, relative to the
C code?

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark at codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713