[vsipl++] [patch] long double FFT tests

[Jules Bergmann]

Nathan (Jasper) Myers wrote:

> 
> I see why I was confused.  The typo was in the test code itself.
> It was not tripped because we haven't been running tests of any
> configuration that lacks FFT float support.  Thus far, that would 
> mean configuring for an FFTW2 that was built to operate (only) on 
> double.

Sounds good.  I was confused too, I thought the typo was in the library. 
-- Jules