[qmtest] How do you add prerequisites test from the command line?
Mohamed Barwani
mohamedb at sgi.com
Fri Aug 29 05:55:56 UTC 2008
To work around this temporarily I had to do the following..
Until some comes up with a better solution for parsing TupleFields contained in SetFields.
Apply this patch...
---
qm/fields.py | 11 +++++++++++
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qm/fields.py b/qm/fields.py
index 6434680..7d9a1ed 100644
--- a/qm/fields.py
+++ b/qm/fields.py
@@ -787,6 +787,11 @@ class TupleField(Field):
self.__fields, value)
+ def ParseTextValue(self, value):
+
+ return self.Validate(value)
+
+
def ParseFormValue(self, request, name, attachment_stores):
value = []
@@ -1240,6 +1245,12 @@ class SetField(Field):
invalid(tok)
# Parse the string constant.
v = eval(tok[1])
+ # SetFields can't contain SetFields, However they can contain a
+ # TupleField. In this case, evaluated string object would be in
+ # the following format for example
+ # "'['test.id', 'result.outcome']'".. To work around just
+ # evaluate it again.
+ if isinstance(self.__contained,TupleField): v = eval(v)
elements.append(self.__contained.ParseTextValue(v))
# There should not be any tokens left over.
Then I can add prereq tests from the command line like so;
$ qmtest create --id=test_b -a resources="['res_a', 'res_b']" -a prerequisites="['[\'test_a\', \'PASS\']']" -a program=ls test command.ExecTest
cheers
--
Mohamed Barwani
ASGQA
"Science may set limits to knowledge, but should not set limits to imagination."
-- Bertrand Russell
More information about the qmtest
mailing list