[qmtest] PATCH: RemoteHost support

[Mark Mitchell]

Stefan Seefeld wrote:
> Mark Mitchell wrote:
> 
>> Yes, I was being a little bit cute.  But, I really did want to 
>> emphasize the "remote" aspect of the class; things like "UploadFile" 
>> don't generally make sense with a local host; it just happens that we 
>> treat local hosts as a special case of remote ones.  I also thought 
>> that "Host" would be more likely to conflict with other classes; 
>> maybe, for example, people have "Host" classes that have methods like 
>> "GetIPAddr".
>>
>> I don't feel very strongly, though; if you think "Host" is better, 
>> I'll change it.  What do you think?
> 
> 
> I think your documentation makes it very clear that the class serves as
> an abstraction to transfer and execute files on (potentially remote) hosts,
> so I don't see much potential for confusion. :-)
> Yes, I'd prefer to call it 'qm.host.Host' and the extension kind a 'host'.

I checked in the attached patch.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark at codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: host.patch
URL: <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/qmtest/attachments/20050613/162fb790/attachment.ksh>