[qmtest] The state of GUI

Mark Mitchell mark at codesourcery.com
Wed Apr 6 16:20:58 UTC 2005


Vladimir Prus wrote:

> You mean "this test results are for configuration 1"? 

I'm not convinced that extending the results file format to contain 
multiple runs is that good of an idea.  The way I would expect the 2.95 
vs. 2.95+stlport vs. ... expectations would be handled is by simply 
running the testsuite is those configurations and saving the results 
files.  The GUI allows you to edit expectations, but the recommended way 
of getting expectations set up is just running the testsuite.

Is that inconvenient?

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark at codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304



More information about the qmtest mailing list