[qmtest] writing composite tests

[Mark Mitchell]

> I believe having such classes would be a huge win in usability, if only
> due to the self-documentation that would add (people could see how to
> set up their own code that does similar things).
> 
> How much work would you expect such a merge to be ? What ramifications
> would that have for existing qmtest users ?

I don't think it would be a whole lot of work; it's just that we would
have to audit those classes and write better documentation.

> I'd volunteer to work on the integration (with a little guidance from
> you). Please let me know whether you are interested, and what timeframe
> you have in mind (pre- or post- 2.1 release ?).

I think post-2.1 release.

I hope to get a beta release of 2.1 out in the next couple of days, with
accumulated fixes to date.  The biggest one outstanding is the problem
with attachments that Vladimir posted, and I'm not sure how easy it will
be to fix that one.

Thanks,

-- 
Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery.com>
CodeSourcery, LLC