[qmtest] Patch 2.0.3 or use latest CVS?

[Scott Lowrey]

Thanks, Mark.  The OS is Red Hat 9 with Python 2.3.3.

I'll try to be more precise in providing bug information next time in 
hopes that you can reproduce.  Are there any specific bits of debug info 
you'd like?

Mark Mitchell wrote:

>> File "/opt/nextest/lib/qm/qm/test/qmtest.py", line 78, in ?
>>    exit_code = command.Execute()
>>  File "/lib/qm/qm/test/cmdline.py", line 569, in Execute
>>  File "/lib/qm/qm/test/cmdline.py", line 1099, in __ExecuteRemote
>>  File "/opt/nextest/lib/python2.3/copy_reg.py", line 50, in
>>_reconstructor
>>    obj = base.__new__(cls, state)
>>TypeError: ('dict.__new__(X): X is not a type object (classobj)',
>><function _reconstructor at 0x81827d4>, (<class
>>qm.test.context.Context at 0x833477c>, <type 'dict'>, {}))
>>    
>>
>
>That's a very strange error and backtrace.
>
>What operating system are you running on?
>
>  
>
>>Should I go with 2.0.3 for production use and apply the patches?  
>>Are there any glaring deficiencies in 2.0.3?  
>>    
>>
>
>I would currently recommend the CVS version, simply because 2.0.3 has
>gotten fairly out of date at this point.  The CVS version should be
>quite stable, despite your experience above.
>
>  
>
>>On a related note, should I send documentation errors and bugs to this
>>list?
>>    
>>
>
>Yes, this is the right list for documentation errors and bugs.
>
>Thanks,
>
>  
>

-- 
*Scott Lowrey*
NexTone Communications
Germantown, Maryland

/(240)912-1369/
www.nextone.com <http://www.nextone.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/qmtest/attachments/20040102/a1aa4c87/attachment.html>