[qmtest] Resource Destruction Order

[Mark Mitchell]

Scott Lowrey wrote:

> I have a test that depends on resource A.  Resource A in turn depends 
> on resource B.
>
> When the test is run, resource B is set up first, followed by resource 
> A.  When the test finishes, resource B is getting torn down *before* 
> resource A, causing resource A's CleanUp to fail.
>
> The order of set up seems logical.  The teardown order does not, yet I 
> have a different test where dependent resources were torn down 
> correctly.  Is this random?  Shouldn't resource creation and 
> destruction be strictly ordered according to dependencies?

Yes -- this is a bug.  We'll fix that.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
(916) 791-8304
mark at codesourcery.com