does concurrency work anymore?

[Jeffrey Oldham]

On Tuesday, January 14, 2003 02:27:41 PM -0500 Mark Eichin 
<eichin at metacarta.com> wrote:

I noticed this with a larger test using my own code, thought it might
be my own tests, but then cooked it down to this case using only the
built-in command.ExecTest and figured I should check with others:

Thank you for the good bug report.  I was able to reproduce the problem 
on a uniprocessor Linux box.  The attached patch resolves the problem. 
The difficulty was that sometimes the list of available targets 
(processors) would sometimes become empty.

To access the change, check out the latest CVS sources, either from the 
head or from the 2.0 release branch (cvs update -rrelease-2-0-branch).

Thank you for using QMTest and for reporting the problem.

Thanks,
Jeffrey D. Oldham
oldham at codesourcery.com
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: concurrent.21Jan.11.5.patch
URL: <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/qmtest/attachments/20030121/2c24411f/attachment.ksh>