[pooma-dev] Open-Source licensing

[James Crotinger]

I'd talk to Ron Minnich or someone back at the lab. If the lab isn't
planning further work on these, then I don't see why not. Hmm - even if they
are, I don't see why not. So why not? 

 

Cheers,

 

            Jim

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
James A. Crotinger                           email:
<mailto:jimc at numerix.com> jimc at numerix.com
NumeriX, LLC                                 phone:  (505) 424-4477 x104
2960 Rodeo Park Dr. W.
Santa Fe, NM 87505

 

  _____  

From: John H. Hall [mailto:jhall at swcp.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 2:05 PM
To: 'pooma-dev at pooma.codesourcery.com'; James Crotinger
Cc: Scott Haney; Stephen Smith
Subject: Re: [pooma-dev] Open-Source licensing

 

So do we need to take it out as open source also? 

John Hall 

On Jul 6, 2004, at 3:56 PM, James Crotinger wrote: 

 

SMARTS was ACL. 

 

        Jim 

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

James A. Crotinger                           email:     jimc at numerix.com 

NumeriX, LLC                                 phone:  (505) 424-4477 x104 

2960 Rodeo Park Dr. W. 

Santa Fe, NM 87505 

 

> -----Original Message----- 

> From: John H. Hall [mailto:jhall at swcp.com] 

> Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 1:52 PM 

> To: 'pooma-dev at pooma.codesourcery.com' 

> Cc: Scott Haney; John Hall; Stephen Smith 

> Subject: [pooma-dev] Open-Source licensing 

> 

> Gang: 

> I have now been asked officially by Jeff Brown (LANL CCS-DO) to get 

> these licensing issues straightened out which makes it official work 

> instead of a part-time hobby. So I need to know which packages y'all 

> want transferred out. I prefer the BSD license myself of the existing 

> licenses out there but I am open to debate on this issue. So here is 

> what I seem to remember. 

> 

> We want: 

> 

> Cheetah 

> Pete 

> Pooma R1 and R2 (R1 for compatibility issues) 

> 

> from the ACL. 

> 

> (Someone needs to remind me what is wrong with the license R2 was taken 

> out under so I don't go down the same path.) 

> 

> And I would like to take out: 

> 

> TecFramework 

> Poomalote 

> Physics Support Layer 

> 

> from the now defunct Blanca project. 

> 

> Are there any other items I need to put in the hopper. Is this list 

> sufficient for the VSIPL people? 

> 

> Thanks, 

> John Hall 

> New Open-Source minion 

> 

> P.S. Who owns the smarts package? 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/pooma-dev/attachments/20040706/701409c1/attachment.html>