[pooma-dev] Re: Cheetah Status
Jeffrey D. Oldham
oldham at codesourcery.com
Mon Aug 16 22:32:14 UTC 2004
Richard Guenther wrote:
>On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>
>
>>Jeffrey D. Oldham wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Richard Guenther wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Btw. I have some Cheetah fixes myself, I can collect these together
>>>>and maybe we could provide at least a patch for download along the
>>>>cheetah tarball.
>>>>
>>>>Richard.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Yes, let's put together your changes and Steve Nolen's changes into a
>>>new Cheetah 1.1.5 release. Will you please send them to me? I'll
>>>create a Cheetah CVS repository.
>>>
>>>
>>I'll send my local changes to you on Monday. But I think we shouldn't
>>release until others are reporting success with a set of collected
>>patches. Obviously I only tested MPI and not the various other means of
>>parallelism in the Cheetah library.
>>
>>
>
>Ok, here's my set of local changes to the Cheetah library.
>
>Sometimes Richard Guenther <richard.guenther at uni-tuebingen.de>
>
> * BUGS: new.
> bin/makeinstall: ignore SCCS dirs.
> config/LINUXGCC.conf: use -g, not -ggdb.
> config/LINUXICC.conf: new.
> configure: don't set shmem_locksrc, build-system
> is broken.
> src/Controller/ControllerFactory.cpp: build factory
> with arg not removed.
> src/Controller/Group.h: reorder initializers.
> src/Controller/Shmem/MM_Allocator.h: remove broken
> method.
> src/Utilities/CheetahRefCountedPtr.h: const pointer
> by value makes no sense.
>
>This patch is against the cheetah-1.1.4 tarball.
>
>
I committed this patch to the new Cheetah repository except for the
configure change. The repository supports shmem because of work I did
this morning.
--
Jeffrey D. Oldham
oldham at codesourcery.com
More information about the pooma-dev
mailing list