[pooma-dev] Re: Cheetah Status

Jeffrey D. Oldham oldham at codesourcery.com
Mon Aug 16 22:32:14 UTC 2004


Richard Guenther wrote:

>On Sat, 14 Aug 2004, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Jeffrey D. Oldham wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Richard Guenther wrote:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>Btw. I have some Cheetah fixes myself, I can collect these together
>>>>and maybe we could provide at least a patch for download along the
>>>>cheetah tarball.
>>>>
>>>>Richard.
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Yes, let's put together your changes and Steve Nolen's changes into a
>>>new Cheetah 1.1.5 release.  Will you please send them to me?  I'll
>>>create a Cheetah CVS repository.
>>>      
>>>
>>I'll send my local changes to you on Monday.  But I think we shouldn't
>>release until others are reporting success with a set of collected
>>patches.  Obviously I only tested MPI and not the various other means of
>>parallelism in the Cheetah library.
>>    
>>
>
>Ok, here's my set of local changes to the Cheetah library.
>
>Sometimes  Richard Guenther <richard.guenther at uni-tuebingen.de>
>
>	* BUGS: new.
>	bin/makeinstall: ignore SCCS dirs.
>	config/LINUXGCC.conf: use -g, not -ggdb.
>	config/LINUXICC.conf: new.
>	configure: don't set shmem_locksrc, build-system
>	is broken.
>	src/Controller/ControllerFactory.cpp: build factory
>	with arg not removed.
>	src/Controller/Group.h: reorder initializers.
>	src/Controller/Shmem/MM_Allocator.h: remove broken
>	method.
>	src/Utilities/CheetahRefCountedPtr.h: const pointer
>	by value makes no sense.
>
>This patch is against the cheetah-1.1.4 tarball.
>  
>
I committed this patch to the new Cheetah repository except for the 
configure change.  The repository supports shmem because of work I did 
this morning.

-- 
Jeffrey D. Oldham
oldham at codesourcery.com




More information about the pooma-dev mailing list