[pooma-dev] Re: pooma-dev Digest 23 Jun 2003 12:57:44 -0000 Issue 243
Mark Mitchell
mark at codesourcery.com
Thu Jun 26 22:29:30 UTC 2003
> Ok, I can see this makes sense somehow. The only problem I see is building
> shared libraries - though I think usage of shared libaries in high
> performance computation is very rare. Though, of course, using automake
> will help doing dependencies and installation rules. So while I'm in
> favour of dropping shared library support (and such libtool), I'd be
> rather not willing to miss automake.
I've never really found automake to be much of a win -- relative to GNU
make -- but then again, I've not found it to be much of a loss either.
And you are volunteering to do the work!
So, I'll back out of this debate. :-)
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark at codesourcery.com
More information about the pooma-dev
mailing list