[pooma-dev] [RFC] PatchFunction cleanup/extension

[Richard Guenther]

On Wed, 8 Jan 2003, Richard Guenther wrote:

> Oh - in the near future I need about 5-7 arrays I can operate on with
> PatchFunction<> and support for Remote MultiPatch engines, too. If we
> only had a "real" preprocessor...

I'm thinking along using the MultiArgX<> classes for this and partially
specialize PatchKernel<> on the MultiArgX<> class. But of course this
would break backward compatibility (which one could perhaps workaround
in PatchFunction<>).

Richard.

--
Richard Guenther <richard.guenther at uni-tuebingen.de>
WWW: http://www.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de/~rguenth/