Pooma License: Up to Date?

[Scott Haney]

Hi Jeffrey,

It did at the time we left the lab; however, what it is now is really a call
for the lab and CodeSourcery. I would suggest consulting with Jeff Brown. My
vote, for what it is worth, is that the parties retain the BSD-style license
from POOMA 2.3. 

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Oldham [mailto:oldham at codesourcery.com] 
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 11:31 AM
To: scotth at proximation.com; mark at codesourcery.com
Cc: pooma-dev at pooma.codesourcery.com
Subject: Pooma License: Up to Date?

Do you know if the Pooma license, in the file "LICENSE," contains the
correct license?

At the very least, the contact URLs should be changed.

Thanks for the information,
Jeffrey D. Oldham
oldham at codesourcery.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/pooma-dev/attachments/20020207/ab2a2b80/attachment.html>