[pooma-dev] Supported Compilers?

[James Crotinger]

We do use compilers that don't put C functions in std::. I think both SGI CC
and VC++ have .h-less C headers, but don't put the C functions in std::. The
.h-less C header files are standard conforming and at least prior to the 2.4
project our rule was to use these since they were more portable. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffrey Oldham [mailto:oldham at codesourcery.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 8:23 AM
> To: pooma-dev at pooma.codesourcery.com
> Subject: [pooma-dev] Supported Compilers?
> 
> 
> 
> 	For Pooma, what compilers are we supporting?  In particular,
> are we supporting any compilers did not recognize the standard
> '.h'-less header filenames?
> 
>        Right now, the code uses both deprecated and standard header
> filenames.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jeffrey D. Oldham
> oldham at codesourcery.com
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/pooma-dev/attachments/20010928/2bb98261/attachment.html>