[pooma-dev] Explicit Instantiation Question (1/5)

[James Crotinger]

BTW, I've switched my mailer to send out plain text. Is the reflector
turning these into HTML? I switched because the reflector was removing any
formatting and leaving my replies in a state such that you couldn't tell
which text was the original message and which was my reply. Now I'm getting
HTML back, which loses the mono-spaced font that is generally pretty handy
for code discussions. 
 
  Jim
 

-----Original Message-----
From: James Crotinger [mailto:JimC at proximation.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 2:08 PM
To: 'Dave Nystrom'
Cc: 'pooma-dev at pooma.codesourcery.com'
Subject: RE: [pooma-dev] Explicit Instantiation Question (1/5)



> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Dave Nystrom [ mailto:wdn at lanl.gov <mailto:wdn at lanl.gov> ] 
> Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 12:16 PM 
> To: pooma-dev 
> Subject: [pooma-dev] Explicit Instantiation Question (1/5) 
> 
> 
> 

Dave, whatever you did to send this message and break it into 5 pieces is
not grokable to OUTLOOK. I got 5 messages, each with a single attachment
named something like ATT00224.TXT. Here's an elided version of what came in
that file:

------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
MIME-Version: 1.0 
Message-ID: <15255.48474.96969.769446 at saltydog.lanl.gov> 
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2001 12:15:54 -0600 
From: Dave Nystrom <wdn at lanl.gov> 
To: pooma-dev <pooma-dev at pooma.codesourcery.com> 
Subject: Explicit Instantiation Question 
X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid 
User-Agent: SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) CLIME/1.13.6 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2YbKEI=?=

 =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCJU4+MRsoQg==?=) MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga 
 Valley) (i386-redhat-linux) 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII 

SSdtIHdvbmRlcmluZyBpZiBhbnlvbmUgb24gcG9vbWEtZGV2IGNvdWxkIHRlbGwgbWUgaG93 
IHRvIGdvIGFib3V0DQpleHBsaWNpdGx5IGluc3RhbnRpYXRpbmcgdGhlIFZpZXcxIGFuZCBB 
bHRWaWV3MSB0ZW1wbGF0ZXMgZnJvbSBQb29tYSAyLg0KTGF0ZWx5LCBjb21waWxlIHRpbWVz 
IGhhdmUgYmVlbiBtaXNlcmFibGUgb24gdGhlIGJsdWVtb3VudGFpbiBiMTggbWFjaGluZQ0K 
[ many lines deleted . . . ] 
RG90LCBSZWZlcmVuY2U8RmllbGQ8VW5pZm9ybVJlY3RpbGluZWFyPChpbnQpMiwgZG91Ymxl 
LCBDYXJ0ZXNpYW48KGludCkyPiA+LCBWZWN0b3I8KGludCkyLCBkb3VibGUsIEZ1bGw+LCBD 
b21wcmVzc2libGVCcmljaz4gPiwgUmVmZXJlbmNlPEZpZWxkPFVuaWZvcm1SZWN0aWxpbmVh 
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

The final file, ATT00234.TXT, ends with 

------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
dW5kZWYgVDMNCg0KI2RlZmluZSBUMSBVbmlmb3JtUmVjdGlsaW5lYXI8KGludCkyLCBkb3Vi 
bGUsIENhcnRlc2lhbjwoaW50KTI+ID4NCiNkZWZpbmUgVDIgYm9vbA0KI2RlZmluZSBUMyBD 
b21wcmVzc2libGVCcmlja1ZpZXcNCklOU1RBTlRJQVRFX1ZJRVcxX0FORF9GUklFTkRTKFQx 
LFQyLFQzKQ0KI3VuZGVmIFQxDQojdW5kZWYgVDINCiN1bmRlZiBUMw== 
------------------------------------------------------------------------ 

Given that the first file just seemed to end with no recognizable sentinal,
I suspect your mailer is splitting these files and that OUTLOOK has no way
to recognize that an attachment has been split across multiple files (sounds
like Scott's email program on the Mac doesn't either). 

I'm sure this is the same problem we saw with Gaby's message awhile back. 

  Jim 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/pooma-dev/attachments/20010906/89cb7808/attachment.html>