[pooma-dev] RFA: Patch for fixes for regression test failures
Mark Mitchell
mark at codesourcery.com
Wed Oct 10 08:28:41 UTC 2001
--On Tuesday, October 09, 2001 07:55:50 PM -0700 Jeffrey Oldham
<oldham at codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 06:35:25PM -0600, Mark P Mitchell wrote:
>>
>> The attached patch attempts to fix several regression tests.
>>
>> Here is a summary:
>>
>> src/Array/tests/ScalarAdvection.cpp:
>>
>> Updated to use approximately the same code that Scott used in
>> examples/Field/ScalarAdvection/ScalarAdvection.cpp.
>>
>> Note that although this test now compiles, it still fails for
>> dimension 2. Scott's code fails in dimension 2, as well. This code
>> works in dimension 1 as does Scott's code.
>
> Was the original code dimension-independent? If so, it would be nice
> that the revised code is also dimension independent.
It's just as dimension-independent as the original.
>
>> src/Connect/Lux/tests/*:
>>
>> These tests failed because LuxConnector.Field.h had not been
>> updated for the new fields.
>
> For me, lux_test2 still fails, but I believe that is a particle problem.
Yes, sorry - I should not have written a `*' there.
> Yes. I have attached a slightly different patch. Would you please
> list on which platforms you tested the code? I compiled and tested
> the code on Linux/g++.
What's different in your patch? Which one should I check in?
I tested on IRIX/KCC.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell mark at codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
More information about the pooma-dev
mailing list