[pooma-dev] Expanding Supported Explicit Instantiations
Mark Mitchell
mark at codesourcery.com
Wed May 23 18:57:46 UTC 2001
>>>>> "Dave" == Dave Nystrom <wdn at lanl.gov> writes:
Dave> I'm also curious whether Jim Crotinger's idea of making 'sv'
Dave> private in the hope that the compiler could optimize it away
Dave> was worth considering.
Probably not. Compilers generally pay little heed to `private'. In
order to do the optimization, you would to prove that there is no way
for the address of the static variable to escape the class, which
requires looking at the bodies of all of the functions in the class.
--
Mark Mitchell mark at codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC http://www.codesourcery.com
More information about the pooma-dev
mailing list