[pooma-dev] RFA: Field-Related Pooma Code Changes
Jeffrey Oldham
oldham at codesourcery.com
Wed Mar 28 16:19:09 UTC 2001
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 07:30:17AM -0700, Scott Haney wrote:
>
> implement the old POOMA Field class, which will be removed from POOMA 2.4 in
> lieu of the Field class currently in NewField. This has a few implications:
So I should use
#include "Pooma/NewFields.h"
not
#include "Pooma/Fields.h"
?
Thanks,
Jeffrey D. Oldham
oldham at codesourcery.com
More information about the pooma-dev
mailing list