[pooma-dev] Speeding Pooma Code on a Branch?

[James Crotinger]

I'm with Mark - for the most part performance tuning won't involve interface
changes unless the results of analysis indicate that certain things need
redesigned. So I'd say that generic performance tweeks should just go in the
main branch, and if we end up redesigning certain abstractions then we can
talk about doing those on a branch. 

	Jim


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffrey Oldham [mailto:oldham at codesourcery.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2001 9:43 PM
> To: pooma-dev at pooma.codesourcery.com
> Subject: [pooma-dev] Speeding Pooma Code on a Branch?
> 
> 
> 
> 	Soon some Pooma developers will turn to reducing Pooma's
> running time.  Should we modify the code on a separate branch, e.g.,
> the running_time branch, so that the Blanca people's use of the
> mainline is not affected?
> 
> 	Hopefully next week, the newfield_revision branch will be
> merged into whichever branch we choose.
> 
> Thanks,
> Jeffrey D. Oldham
> oldham at codesourcery.com
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/pooma-dev/attachments/20010821/b7ced2fa/attachment.html>