[pooma-dev] Example of bad behavior from particle boundarycon ditions
James Crotinger
JimC at proximation.com
Fri Apr 6 20:30:59 UTC 2001
I don't have these problems. I've only used the Cygwin CVS for Pooma work,
and my line-endings are the DOS ones.
Question: when you installed cygwin it asks if you are installing for UNIX
or DOS. I selected DOS. Did you select UNIX? Perhaps that is the difference?
Jim
---------------------------------------------------
James A. Crotinger
Software Research Scientist
Proximation, LLC
-----Original Message-----
From: Julian C. Cummings [mailto:cummings at linkline.com]
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2001 12:43 PM
To: James Crotinger; Steve Nolen; Pooma
Subject: RE: [pooma-dev] Example of bad behavior from particle
boundaryconditions
Hi Jim,
I managed to build libpooma under cygwin.
I used --arch LINUXEGCS since the compiler
is older than the version Jeffrey is using
with LINUXgcc. You may have to say
"perl configure ..." instead of "configure ..."
if perl is not found correctly. I found that
I had to create the directory lib/$POOMASUITE
by hand. Finally, the "which" command does
not exist in the Bash shell, so you will see
a bunch of ignorable errors about that.
Other than that, it seems to work OK.
-- Julian
P.S. If you are working with Intel VTune, perhaps
you have solved the problem of Unix vs. Dos line
endings in the VC++ ide files. If so, please share
your wisdom on this!
-----Original Message-----
From: James Crotinger [mailto:jcrotinger at mac.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2001 7:02 AM
To: cummings at linkline.com; Steve Nolen; Pooma
Subject: Re: [pooma-dev] Example of bad behavior from particle
boundaryconditions
on 4/5/01 2:49 AM, Julian C. Cummings at cummings at linkline.com wrote:
> Unfortunately, I do not have a copy of
> CW Pro 6.1 for the PC to test with. Are
> you able to run the CW debugger and see
> what is going wrong?
I've been attempting to do my development (working on the version of destroy
with iterator pairs) using CW 6.1 for the PC, and I've got to say that it
SUCKS.
I'm planning to install VTUNE today and give it a try.
I've got the full cygwin32 installation - is there enough there to do
configure? Does that version of the compiler compile Pooma (its 2.95.2, I
think).
Jim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://sourcerytools.com/pipermail/pooma-dev/attachments/20010406/45b19bed/attachment.html>
More information about the pooma-dev
mailing list