[mips-tls] A couple of potential changes to the MIPS TLS ABI

[Thiemo Seufer]

Dominic Sweetman wrote:
[snip]
> > There are a couple of other quirks for this; the only one I can think
> > of offhand is MIPS-I load delay slots, which would mean neither
> > sequence could be used as-is.
> 
> There are relatively few MIPS-I machines out there.  Would it be
> unacceptable if the standard NPTL system failed to work on them?

But there are some, and a generic userland should IMHO support them.
It's a small price to keep o32 working everywhere.


Thiemo