[coldfire-gnu-discuss] MCF51QE128 flash protection

[thierry maldague]

Thank You very much, Sergei

Now, it works fine

Thierry

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sergei" <syakovlev at thinksrs.com>
To: "thierry maldague" <thierrymaldague at hotmail.com>
Cc: <coldfire-gnu-discuss at codesourcery.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: [coldfire-gnu-discuss] MCF51QE128 flash protection


> Hi Thierry,
>
> You might not need to wait for new release.
> Try to modify linker file to reserve 24 bytes right after end of vector 
> table (addr 0x400).
> To do this I use following (for MCF52235):
>    LONG (0x01234567)
>    LONG (0x89abcdef)
>    LONG (0xffffffff)
>    LONG (0x00000000)
>    LONG (0x00000000)
>    LONG (0xffffffff)
>
> Best regards,
> Sergei.
>
>
>
> thierry maldague wrote:
>> Thank you, Maxim
>> I'm anxiously awaiting the next release, because debug of MCF51 in flash 
>> is impossible as the memory is locked.
>>
>> Thierry
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Maxim Kuvyrkov" 
>> <maxim at codesourcery.com>
>> To: "thierry maldague" <thierrymaldague at hotmail.com>
>> Cc: <coldfire-gnu-discuss at codesourcery.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 7:09 AM
>> Subject: Re: [coldfire-gnu-discuss] MCF51QE128 flash protection
>>
>>
>>> thierry maldague wrote:
>>>> Hello
>>>>  I use Codesourcery Lite for Coldfire with a demo board MCF51QE128
>>>> When building an executable (elf) and programming it in Flash with P&E 
>>>> progcfv1_16K, it appears that the Flash is secured (bits SEC of NVOPT 
>>>> set to 10)
>>>> Is it any option to set these bits to 00 to leave the flash unsecured ?
>>>
>>> Hi Thierry,
>>>
>>> As far as I remember, there was a bug in the linker script in the last 
>>> release of ColdFire ELF Lite toolchain.  This will be fixed in the next 
>>> release.
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Maxim K.
>>> CodeSourcery
>>>
>>
>>
>> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
>> signature database 4222 (20090707) __________
>>
>> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>>
>> http://www.eset.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> __________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus 
> signature database 4222 (20090707) __________
>
> The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
>
> http://www.eset.com
>
>
>