[coldfire-gnu-discuss] MCF52233

[Mats Blide]

Thanks for your answerer. What about RAMBAR0 :-). I must say I am a bit 
surprised to finde these built into the compiler. I expected to find such 
things defined in some header file. I’ll try your suggestions.
Rgds
Mats


>From: "Paul McConkey" <paul.mcconkey at cambridgeimaging.co.uk>
>To: "Mats Blide" 
><matsblide at hotmail.com>,<coldfire-gnu-discuss at codesourcery.com>
>Subject: RE: [coldfire-gnu-discuss] MCF52233
>Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 14:14:19 -0000
>
> > The switch I used -m528x made runnable code, but the code I now try to
>assemble contains reference to RAMBAR1
> > giving me compilation error with switch -m528x but not with -m5200.
>I'm a complete beginner with GNU tools and
> > coldfire. So this might be a stupid question, but any help is
>appreciated.
>
>With some cpu switches gcc appears to use RAMBAR and RAMBAR1 as synonyms
>as they are the same thing in CF V2 cores, if you still have problems
>with the -mcpu=52233 switch, try changing the source to refer to RAMBAR
>instead of RAMBAR1.
>
>
>Cheers,
>
>Paul.

_________________________________________________________________
Premiär 17/11 för Casino Royale! http://www.msn.se/noje/casinoroyale/