[autoconf-conversion] libffi take 2

Andreas Schwab schwab at suse.de
Sat Jun 21 14:58:44 UTC 2003


"Bonzini" <bonzini at gnu.org> writes:

|> > Paolo> +# It still complains about o32.s and o32.S, so let's do this.
|> > Paolo> +%_cpp.s: %.S
|> > Paolo> + cp $< $@
|> >
|> > "%" rules aren't portable.  Let's not use them.  I'm not sure what the
|> > problem is exactly, but I'm sure we can fix it some other way.
|> 
|> I can use explicit rules anyway.  But, is libffi really being built with something
|> other than gcc?

It's not a matter of the compiler, but of the make program.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab at suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."



More information about the autoconf-conversion mailing list